License - Revision history

T1t0 at 21:44, 9 October 2023

2023-10-09T21:44:01Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Linking_and_derived_works
@@ Line 25: / Line 27: @@
 </pre>
-See also
+See also:
-* license compatibility graphs here https://dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html , here http://gkapi.blogspot.com/2016/09/foss-license-compatibilities.html and here https://wiki.geant.org/display/GSD/General+information+about+OSS+licences#GeneralinformationaboutOSSlicences-RelationshipbetweenmostusedlicencesinG%C3%89ANT
-* compatibility checker here https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/solution/joinup-licensing-assistant/jla-compatibility-checker
+* license compatibility graphs:

T1t0 at 00:24, 9 September 2023

2023-09-09T00:24:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 9 September 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:
	see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception		see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception

	And more, Affero and GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) extend the restriction to software that runs on network. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License		And more,

			Affero and GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) extend the restriction to software that runs on network. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License

	<pre>		<pre>
Line 24:		Line 26:

	See also		See also
	- license compatibility graphs here https://dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html , here http://gkapi.blogspot.com/2016/09/foss-license-compatibilities.html and here https://wiki.geant.org/display/GSD/General+information+about+OSS+licences#GeneralinformationaboutOSSlicences-RelationshipbetweenmostusedlicencesinG%C3%89ANT		* license compatibility graphs here https://dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html , here http://gkapi.blogspot.com/2016/09/foss-license-compatibilities.html and here https://wiki.geant.org/display/GSD/General+information+about+OSS+licences#GeneralinformationaboutOSSlicences-RelationshipbetweenmostusedlicencesinG%C3%89ANT
	- compatibility checker here https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/solution/joinup-licensing-assistant/jla-compatibility-checker		* compatibility checker here https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/solution/joinup-licensing-assistant/jla-compatibility-checker

T1t0 at 00:24, 9 September 2023

2023-09-09T00:24:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 9 September 2023
Line 23:		Line 23:
	</pre>		</pre>

	See also license compatibility graphs ~~there~~ https://dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html ~~and there~~ http://gkapi.blogspot.com/2016/09/foss-license-compatibilities.html		See also
			- license compatibility graphs here https://dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html , here http://gkapi.blogspot.com/2016/09/foss-license-compatibilities.html and here https://wiki.geant.org/display/GSD/General+information+about+OSS+licences#GeneralinformationaboutOSSlicences-RelationshipbetweenmostusedlicencesinG%C3%89ANT
			- compatibility checker here https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/solution/joinup-licensing-assistant/jla-compatibility-checker

T1t0: Created page with "from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Linking_and_derived_works

 According to the FSF, "The GPL does not require you to release your modified ver..."

2023-09-09T00:12:17Z

Created page with "from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Linking_and_derived_works <pre> According to the FSF, "The GPL does not require you to release your modified ver..."

New page

from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Linking_and_derived_works

<pre>
According to the FSF, "The GPL does not require you to release your modified version or any part of it. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them."[64] However, if one releases a GPL-licensed entity to the public, there is an issue regarding linking: namely, whether a proprietary program that uses a GPL library is in violation of the GPL.

This key dispute is whether non-GPL software can legally statically link or dynamically link to GPL libraries
</pre>

And more

<pre>
The Free Software Foundation (which holds the copyright of several notable GPL-licensed software products and of the license text itself) asserts that an executable that uses a dynamically linked library is indeed a derivative work. This does not, however, apply to separate programs communicating with one another.[65]

The Free Software Foundation also created the LGPL, which is nearly identical to the GPL, but with additional permissions to allow linking for the purposes of "using the library".
</pre>

see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception

And more, Affero and GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) extend the restriction to software that runs on network. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License

<pre>
[AGPL ]It is intended for software designed to be run over a network, adding a provision requiring that the corresponding source code of modified versions of the software be prominently offered to all users who interact with the software over a network.[6]
</pre>

See also license compatibility graphs there https://dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html and there http://gkapi.blogspot.com/2016/09/foss-license-compatibilities.html